Home | Background | Status | Organization | Activities | Events Possible styles for the coordination of the study are as follows:       (a) Coordination is made so that published papers, as a result of the coordination, will be like this: Author 0 et al. Overview of the study Author 1 et al. Aspect 1 of the study Author 2 et al. Aspect 2 of the study ..... ..... ..... ..... Author n et al. Aspect n of the study Author 0 et al. Synthesis of the study       The "Author 0" would be the coordinator. Or, another person may take that role if the coordination process leads to such a decision. Author i (i=0,...,n) can be the same as Author j (j=0,...,n).       (b) At first several people write papers on one event/topic independently. They would independently try to obtain as many permissions as possible from PIs, and write papers with the data they can use. After a few papers are written, someone writes a synthesis paper of previously published papers. That "someone" may be selected beforehand or at the time of writing the synthesis paper. He/she could be the event/topic coordinator. The synthesis paper could cover aspects missed by previous "individual" papers.       (c) Similar to (b), but without the synthesis paper. That is, totally uncoordinated writing of papers! At least the event/topic coordinator should try to write a paper on his/her event/topic. Home | Background | Status | Organization | Activities | Events